Page 41 - History 2020
P. 41

This was much more than an academic debate. Rather it was a culture war over the

            nature of parliament, power, British identity and the role of reason and science in
            government; ultimately, the future direction of Britain. Was the 1832 Reform Act the
            beginning of a new era of reform, or just a one-off? The Gothics, keen to reassert
            tradition and stability, were swimming with the tide of Merrie England. Their capture
            of Parliament was a significant victory in these Victorian culture wars*.

            *Edward J. Gillin A Radical Building: The Science of Politics and the New Palace of Westminster
            (2017)
            https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/victorian-palace-of-science/radical-building-the-science-
            of-politics-and-the-new-palace-of-westminster/C39AEFD0BA65952E7EBEF47ED90410AC

            While the new Palace of Westminster was being built, MP’s were housed were
            housed in temporary accommodation rigged up on the site. Building started in 1840
            and not finished until 1870, although MP’s were able to use the Commons chamber
            from 1852.

            If indeed “we shape our houses, then they shape us”, how has it affected things that

            since the 1850’s our Parliament has been housed in a sumptuous Victorian Gothic
            palace? Historian Richard Tombs notes that after the opening of the new Palace of
            Westminster, the Victorian Parliament changed. It grew steadily more aloof from the
            public. Governments tightened their grip. Debates on petitions were ended.
            Ministers took tighter control of parliamentary business. Guillotining of debates was
            adopted to curtail discussion. Above all, party discipline grew; from the 1860’s the
            two major parties began to develop national organisations suited to managing mass

            electorates and Parliament became less of “deliberative” assembly.

            Bagehot on the Constitution: Dignified and Efficient
            As it happens, one of our shrewdest writers on the Constitution was a Victorian,
            Walter Bagehot. Let’s see if he can help us better understand our “Gothic
            constitution”.

            Bagehot published The English Constitution in 1867. Unlike many such guides, his is

            readable and accessible. He attempts to explain how it operates as a whole, what
            drives and animates it, “the living reality in contrast to the paper description”, its
            “inner moving essence”.

            Who was Bagehot? He was from Langport in Somerset, studied maths and
            philosophy, trained as a lawyer and barrister, but instead went into the family

            banking and shipping firm. He also became a journalist, founding the National
            Review, which published the first review of Darwin’s Origin of the Species, and
   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46