Page 25 - History 2020
P. 25

Burke tore into the Revolutionary idea that a clean sheet in politics and government

            would create a utopia. He argued for tradition, and for a reliance on historical
            experience, not idealist Revolutionary blueprints or abstract concepts of “natural
            rights.” Rather, societies changed gradually, in an organic way. Locke and Rousseau
            said there was a “social contract” between people and their rulers; but to Burke
            “society is a contract between the generations: a partnership between those who are
            living, those who have lived before us, and those who have yet to be born.” One
            writer calls this idea “the democracy of the dead”.


            Burke condemned the idea that the idealistic Revolutionary ends justified using
            violent and oppressive means, warning that it would end in democratic, demagogic
            tyranny. Remarkably, he wrote his earliest condemnation of the Revolution as early
            as 1790, long before its extremist trends were revealed in the execution of King Louis
            XVI (1792) and the Reign of Terror (1793-4). This gave his criticisms great moral
            authority. He even predicted that the Revolutionary chaos would make “some
            popular general the master of your whole republic”, probably with Cromwell in mind

            but equally fitting Napoleon who became dictator in 1799.

            His writings were lauded by enemies of the Revolution all over Europe. They also
            inspired equally celebrated ripostes from radicals Thomas Paine and Mary
            Wollstonecraft. However, in political life Burke was became even more isolated. His
            condemnation of the French Revolution led to a break with the Fox Whigs and he
            moved towards backing Tory Prime Minister Pitt the Younger. But the Tories never
            forgot his early criticisms of George III. Burke was also critical of British repression in

            Ireland (as he had been in America) which he warned might provoke “Jacobinism”*
            to spread to his native Ireland (he was right; it did, in the 1798 Irish Rebellion). At the
            end, Burke’s political influence was almost nil; Pitt spurned his advice and the Whigs
            never forgave his desertion. His final years were overshadowed by the death of his
            only son.

            *The name “Jacobin” came to be applied to anyone during and after the French Revolution with
            radical or extreme revolutionary opinions. Originally, they were the followers of Robespierre, the
            most radical of the leading French Revolutionaries. They were called Jacobins because they set up
            their political club (“The Society of the Friends of the Constitution”, October 1789) in an old convent
            founded by the Dominican friars near the Catholic Church of St Jacques (Latin “Iacobus”) in Paris.
            The original “Jacobins” were thus medieval Dominican friars. They should not be confused with the
            British “Jacobites” - rebels loyal to the Catholic King James II (Latin also “Iacobus”), removed by the
            Glorious Revolution of 1688.

            What was Burke’s legacy?
            Burke’s intellectual legacy was not a tidy philosophical theory, but a set of ideas
            expressed in a violent anti-Revolutionary polemic. Thus, modern conservatism was
   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30